Skip to main content

Tag: Blazed Weekly News

Federal Hemp Loophole Must Be Implemented With No Delay

By Jordan Zuccarelli |

In case you missed it, a new op-ed in the Washington Examiner highlights a critical public-policy issue: the federal prohibition on intoxicating hemp products that Congress passed into law with bipartisan support last November must be fully implemented this year, without delay.

 

With the U.S. House Committee on Agriculture set to begin markup of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 – also known as the Farm Bill – on March 3rd, the intoxicating hemp industry is pushing hard to keep these products on the market.

 

But as Diane Carlson writes, “the measure passed with a rare bipartisan supermajority of 76 senators. It reflected what harmed families, emergency physicians, leading public health and youth-serving organizations, law enforcement, regulators, and 39 state attorneys general, both Democrat and Republican, had already concluded: this loophole had become a national public-health crisis. It was causing unacceptable harm to children, families, and communities nationwide.”

 

Carlson, who is the co-founder and national policy director of One Chance to Grow Up, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that educates and advocates children’s interests in marijuana policy, goes on to note that “in the “Wild West” of the intoxicating hemp market, there are no age gates, no testing standards, no ingredient disclosures, no warnings. The only assured variable is predictable harm from those building businesses off targeting children and deceiving the public through “dupe” products and false claims.”

 

Background: A provision signed into law last November will end the nationwide unregulated sale of psychoactive Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products disguised as “hemp” or cannabidiol (CBD). These items have flooded gas stations, convenience stores and online marketplaces with gummies, vapes and drinks that can rival marijuana in potency and typically appeal to children. The prohibition is set to take effect this November, but the intoxicating hemp industry is seeking to delay implementation of the law.

 

The Problem: Since 2018, bad actors exploited hemp regulations to create unregulated, lab-produced intoxicants (gummies, vapes, drinks) with THC levels matching regulated marijuana markets but are sold without age gates, testing standards or ingredient disclosures.

 

The Harm: The consequences are real. The loophole has contributed to accidental child poisonings, emergency room visits, impaired driving incidents and serious mental health concerns.

 

Carlson writes “the intoxicating hemp free-for-all led to the rise of accidental child poisonings and injuries, ER visits and hospitalizations, impaired driving, and other serious physical and mental health effects, including acute psychosis that, for some, led to suicide.”

 

The Solution: The closure doesn’t ban hemp or eliminate CBD – it simply ensures intoxicating products can’t be marketed as “hemp” and sold in easily accessible stores and locations. Implementation cannot be delayed if we’re serious about protecting children and families.

 

“If a product can intoxicate, it should not be marketed as wellness ‘hemp’ and sold next to everyday candies, snacks, and drinks outside of a voter-approved marijuana dispensary.”

 

Congress acted. Now the law must take effect on schedule. Protecting kids from unregulated intoxicating products should not be controversial, it should be common sense.

 

The full op-ed in the Washington Examiner can be viewed here: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/4468479/hemp-loophole-must-implemented-no-delay/

Spielberg & Disclosure Day

 

For nearly half a century, Steven Spielberg has used cinema to rehearse humanity for a moment he has never fully shown on screen: official extraterrestrial disclosure.

His protégé, J. J. Abrams, inherited this framework—and in Super 8, echoed it with near-surgical precision. When viewed alongside Close Encounters of the Third Kind, the similarities are not homage alone. They form a blueprint.

The Train Derailment: A Disclosure Trigger

In Super 8, the story detonates when a catastrophic train derailment shatters the calm of a small American town. The military swiftly arrives, sealing off the area, controlling information, and reframing the incident as a public safety concern.

In Close Encounters, the same mechanism is deployed—decades earlier.

The climactic contact event at Devil’s Tower is made possible only after a manufactured emergency: the public is told a train derailment spilled toxic chemicals, justifying evacuation. This false flag clears the area for the rendezvous while Roy Neary and others move toward the truth.

Two films. Same narrative lever.

The train derailment is not chaos—it is logistics. Domestic Normalcy Meets the Impossible

Spielberg and Abrams both anchor disclosure not in the skies—but in the living room.

Super 8

As morning routines unfold, TV news reports the derailment. Children bang toys in the background. When Joe Lamb enters the house, Charles is transfixed by a small black-and-white television broadcasting the crisis.

Close Encounters

Roy Neary watches the same kind of broadcast—alone, desperate, drinking Budweiser—as his family life collapses. The derailment near Devil’s Tower interrupts domestic despair, not adventure.

 

In both films:

The television is small

The image is grainy

The family is fractured

The truth arrives quietly, not spectacularly

Disclosure doesn’t crash through the roof. It leaks in through the TV.

 

Toy Trains, Fractions, and Repetition

Spielberg’s visual language is obsessive—and deliberate.

Roy Neary explains fractions to his son using toy train cars, just before offering a choice between Goofy Golf or Pinocchio. The banging of toys punctuates the moment—echoing later scenes of domestic unrest.

In Super 8, Joe Lamb paints model trains in his spare time. The derailment becomes personal before it becomes cosmic.

Model trains are not props.

They are preconditioning tools—symbols of control, order, and derailment. Abrams doesn’t just salute Spielberg here. He repeats the lesson. Loss of Family as the Cost of Truth. Both films are built on trauma. Joe Lamb loses his mother in a sudden industrial accident. Roy Neary loses his family—and eventually leaves Earth entirely. In both cases, disclosure costs something permanent.

This theme deepens when viewed alongside Spielberg’s later autobiographical work, The Fabelmans, where parental divorce is revealed as a defining wound. The same absence echoes through E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, with Elliott’s father quietly gone—off in Mexico with another woman.

What will that day look like?

Contact is never free.

Truth rearranges families & Children as the Disclosure Constant

Across Spielberg’s universe—and Abrams’ continuation—children are always ready.

  • E.T.
  • Super 8
  • Close Encounters
  • Even Taken

 

Adults panic. Institutions lie. While Children adapt. If disclosure happens, Spielberg suggests, it will not break the young—it will expose the old.

Disclosure Day 2026: Cinema or Conditioning?

The question is no longer if disclosure will come—but how it will be framed.

Will it arrive: As a Spielberg-directed return to the genre by cinema’s greatest architect of UFO storytelling?

Or as another government-aligned narrative, laundered through Hollywood to guide public reaction?

Spielberg’s filmography already includes: Close Encounters, E.T. , War of the Worlds , Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, A.I. Transformers, Men in Black (producer), Amazing Stories, & Taken to name a few.

Decades of preparation. Decades of normalization.

Final Thought

Spielberg never taught us to fear aliens. He taught us to fear being lied to. If Disclosure Day comes, it won’t look like a blockbuster. It will look like a news report…playing softly in the background…while families argue in the next room. The only remaining question is whether Spielberg will finally show us the moment he’s spent a lifetime preparing us to see.

👽🎬

 

Texas Hemp Shops Raided on Junk Science, Judge Refuses to Step In

Well, Texas did it again. A federal judge just told a couple of hemp shop owners in Abilene,
“sorry folks, you’re on your own.”

Here’s what happened. Brennon and Brittany Manske run CBD House of Healing. Like a lot of
Texas hemp businesses, they’ve been trying to carve out a place in this messy, confusing market
since the 2018 Farm Bill supposedly made hemp products legal. They built their shop around
CBD and other hemp-derived products, kept their shelves stocked, and had customers who relied
on them.

Then, in August, Abilene police showed up with a search warrant. Officers raided the place and
walked out with roughly $400,000 worth of products. The Manskes say the raid was based on
misinformation, bad testing, and outright lies. They argue every single item taken was federally
legal hemp.

So they sued. They asked a federal judge to step in and order the city to give their inventory back
and stop any more raids. Because let’s be honest, when you lose nearly half a million dollars in
merchandise, it’s not just a setback. It is a death sentence for a small business.
But Judge James Wesley Hendrix said no. He ruled that it is not the federal court’s job to
interfere with ongoing state criminal proceedings. He called the request for a temporary
restraining order “an extraordinary remedy” and basically said, “come back when the state case
is over.” And in his view, financial loss does not count as irreparable harm. As for reputational
damage, the judge said that is speculative at best.

That is a tough pill to swallow. Imagine having your entire store cleaned out, customers left
wondering if you are even legitimate, and being told, “Don’t worry, you can fight it later.” By
then, later might be too late.

Now let’s talk about the so-called evidence. The raid relied on field kits from Safariland and lab
results from National Medical Services. Both have a reputation for overestimating THC levels.
These tests have been criticized for years. They are unreliable, inconsistent, and often flat-out
wrong. According to the lawsuit, one of the very officers involved in the raid even admitted the
tests were not solid while the raid was happening. Yet somehow, those results were enough to
justify wiping out a local business.

 






(Store Raids and Check ups by Law Enforcement have Increased in Recent Years as Lt. Gov Dan Patrick's

Crusade against Federally Legal Hemp Products were stepped up after the 89th Legislative Session began.)

And the Manskes are not alone. Another shop owner, Nate Shahbain, joined the lawsuit. He has
not been raided yet, but he is looking over his shoulder every day, wondering when it is his turn.
That is what this kind of enforcement does. It spreads fear through an entire industry.

This is the bigger problem: the disconnect between federal and state enforcement. The 2018
Farm Bill said hemp was legal if it contains less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC. That should have
been clear. But in Texas, local police departments have taken it upon themselves to interpret and
enforce the rules however they see fit. We have seen it with smokable hemp bans. We have seen
it with THCA crackdowns. And now we are seeing it with raids based on junk science.
It creates a patchwork where your business can be perfectly legal on paper and still be treated
like a drug den if the wrong cop decides to test your products with the wrong kit. And let’s be
honest, if those kits were accurate, we would not have half the wrongful arrests and lawsuits we
have seen across the country.

So where does this leave the hemp industry in Texas? On shaky ground, as always. The judge
made it clear the Manskes will have to keep fighting in state court first. Their products stay
locked up in an evidence room, their shop struggles to stay open, and their customers are left
without access.

For the rest of the hemp retailers out there, the message is pretty clear: you are on your own.
Federal law will not save you. Local politics will steamroll you. And even if you can prove you
were right all along, by the time the courts sort it out, your business might not survive.
That is the reality of doing business in Texas right now. Hemp is legal, but only until someone
with a badge decides it is not.

Texas Smoke Shop Owners React to New THC Legislation

 

LifestyleCannabisCannabis Law

Austin, TX – State legislators are considering a  ban of the sale of all consumable hemp products, leaving the cannabis industry and cannabis advocates in the State of Texas in an uproar.

New cannabis legislation threatens to dismantle a $5.5 Billion industry by bringing an end to the sale of all consumable hemp products in Texas.

This will affect over 10,000 businesses in Texas according to the latest estimates, and over 55,000 jobs will be lost.

“We haven’t abused any loopholes in legislation, because we did not write the legislation nor were we asked to help or assist in the regulations” states Ahmad Alnajjar, owner of Trippiez Smoke Shop. “Everything we have sold and produced has been federally legal with the recent federal farm bill guidelines. We want safety like the legislators do, we WANT proper regulation to ensure safety, abide by the law, and provide the right products for millions of Texans who rely on this as much as we rely on them.”

With five locations in Austin and plans to open an additional location soon, Trippiez Smoke Shop will definitely feel the burn when this legislation is enacted. Imposing fees, creating criminal offenses, and providing an administrative penalty for violations is the primary objective of the new legislation. TX SB3 is sponsored by several members of the state Senate and championed by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Texas legalized hemp-derived products in 2019, but according to the Lt. Gov., retailers have abused this by selling products with a THC level of above 0.3%. CBD and CBG products are exempt provided that they are registered, plainly labeled and in resealable, child-proof containers.

“All the businesses who follow regulations are being punished for the very very few businesses who act carelessly”, protests Alnajjar.

The concerns of those owners who will not have to close their doors is significant, as well. Adjustments will have to be made such as cutting labor costs, and profit will be lost on surplus hemp-derived inventory if not sold before the allotted grace period. 


For more information, contact (512) 291-2325 or visit Trippiez online.

Trippiez #1 12636 Research Blvd b104, Austin, TX 78759

Trippiez #2 13764 Research Blvd Austin, Texas 78750

Trippiez #3 aka SOCO 6606 S Congress Ave, Austin, TX 78745

Trippiez #4 16238 Ranch to Market Rd. 620 Suite G, Austin, TX 78717

Trippiez #5 11699 Hero Way W, Leander, TX 78641

Top Ten Prohibitionist Lies

The March 3 hearing showcased the best anti-THC talking points from the 1970’s, 80’s and beyond. Like a hit parade of bogus tunes, here’s the Top Ten Prohibitionist Lies

1. “Marijuana is a Gateway Drug”

• Falsehood: Using marijuana leads people to use harder drugs like heroin or meth.

• Reality: Numerous studies, including from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), show no causal link between marijuana use and subsequent hard drug use. The real gateway factors tend to be socioeconomic conditions, trauma, or early exposure to addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine.

2. “Marijuana Causes Violent Crime”

• Falsehood: Legalizing marijuana increases violent crime rates.

• Reality: Crime statistics from states that have legalized cannabis (e.g., Colorado, Washington) show no significant rise in violent crime—and some cities have even reported decreases. In contrast, illegal drug trade violence often decreases when legal markets replace black market sales.

3. “Marijuana Lowers IQ and Makes People Lazy”

• Falsehood: Long-term cannabis use reduces intelligence and destroys motivation.

• Reality: Studies show no significant IQ drop in adults who use cannabis. While adolescent overuse may impact cognitive development, occasional adult use has not been linked to measurable declines in intelligence. Moreover, many successful professionals and creatives openly use cannabis without suffering motivational issues.

4. “Marijuana is as Dangerous as Heroin and Fentanyl”

• Falsehood: Cannabis is a “Schedule I drug” because it’s highly addictive and has no medical benefits.

• Reality: Marijuana is not chemically addictive in the way opioids or nicotine are, and it has established medical benefits for pain, epilepsy, PTSD, and more. In fact, it is far less harmful than alcohol and prescription painkillers.

5. “Legalization Leads to More Teen Use”

• Falsehood: When states legalize marijuana, more teenagers will start using it.

• Reality: Studies from The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and Colorado Department of Public Health show no increase in youth marijuana use post-legalization. In fact, some states have seen decreases in underage use due to better regulation.

6. “Marijuana Kills Brain Cells”

• Falsehood: Smoking weed permanently destroys brain cells.

• Reality: This myth originated from a flawed 1970s study where researchers suffocated monkeys with excessive cannabis smoke, depriving them of oxygen. Modern neuroscience shows that cannabis affects brain function but does not destroy brain cells.

7. “People Overdose on Marijuana”

• Falsehood: Cannabis use leads to lethal overdoses.

• Reality: There are zero recorded deaths from cannabis overdose. While high doses can cause discomfort, anxiety, or nausea, it does not suppress respiratory function like opioids.

8. “Legal Marijuana States Have More DUIs and Traffic Accidents”

• Falsehood: Marijuana legalization leads to more impaired driving and crashes.

• Reality: While THC can impair driving ability in some cases, overall crash rates have not spiked in legal states. Many studies indicate that drunk driving is a far bigger problem than cannabis-impaired driving.

9. “Marijuana Has No Legitimate Medical Use”

• Falsehood: There is no scientific evidence supporting medical marijuana.

• Reality: Cannabis is FDA-approved for multiple conditions, and studies confirm its effectiveness in treating epilepsy (CBD), chronic pain, nausea from chemotherapy, PTSD, and multiple sclerosis. The U.S. government even holds a patent on cannabinoids for their neuroprotective effects.

10. “Marijuana Legalization Harms the Economy”

• Falsehood: Legal weed will damage businesses and hurt the economy.

• Reality: Legal cannabis is one of the fastest-growing industries, generating billions in tax revenue, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs, and reducing costs related to law enforcement

Skip to content